Social Media and the Fitness to Practice

A recent case[i] to come before the General Dental Council (GDC) involved a dental nurse in Northern Ireland who had made a sectarian and strongly offensive comment on social media.  She admitted guilt under the terms of the GDC’s code of conduct regarding use of social media, and was reprimanded on the grounds of her fitness to practice being impaired.

A person who breaks the rules of a professional organisation should be disciplined, or the rules are of little value.  However, in this case one pertinent question is surely whether a comment made on social media, however inflammatory, impairs a person’s fitness to practice?

Continue reading Social Media and the Fitness to Practice

A Day Off For Democracy?

In the run-up to the Brexit referendum, The Independent newspaper ran a story with the following headline: “EU referendum: British public wrong about nearly everything, study shows”.[1] In the weeks that followed, many lamented the alleged ignorance of large swathes of the British population, and similar concerns have been raised about the American electorate in advance of their upcoming presidential election.

James Madison, one of the American ‘Founding Fathers’ warned that “a popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both”. Assuming for the sake of argument that there is widespread misunderstanding of political, economic, and social reality, how much of a problem is it, and what should we do about it?

Continue reading A Day Off For Democracy?

New Videos on Climate Change

From 2014-2015 I had a project on the ethics of climate change, which included a large number of events, which were recorded.

With the exception of the main conference, and the workshop on rationing, all the events were actually designed with videos in mind, such that the events were designed with the intention of making videos that people would watch after the event, with the aim of reaching a much larger audience than could be reached in the event itself.

Instead of going with the usual academic format of a presentation of 25 minutes or more followed by Q&A, these events had a number of short presentations (often between 5 and 10 minutes) followed by a panel-based Q&A (kind of Question Time style, for those of you based in the UK.)

These videos  – featuring a number of leading academics from a range of different disciplines – have now been uploaded, and are now available to anyone who is interested.

Continue reading New Videos on Climate Change

The New Deepwater Horizon Film

Last week, I went to see the new Deepwater Horizon film, without really knowing what to expect.

Ultimately, I was pretty impressed with the film, even if it is not perfect. Below I will offer a few thoughts about some of the ethical issues highlighted by the film.

First though, we might worry that the film will be inaccurate or hugely simplified, in which case we might wonder if there is really any value about reflecting on the ethical issues raised by the film, if the film has nothing in common with reality.

The following articles discuss the extent to which the movie is accurate.

Continue reading The New Deepwater Horizon Film

‘Professionalisation’ of the banking ‘profession’

Yesterday our report on professionalism in UK banking was published.  The report is the culmination of a research project commissioned by the Banking Standards Board which took around six months to complete.

In the course of the research, and particularly the 54 interviews which we carried out with a range of banks, building societies, banking and non-banking professional bodies and other financial stakeholders, we had the opportunity to take a close look at an industry at a critical stage of its history.  The banking sector in the UK is in the process of trying to answer some difficult questions, and our research plays a small part in that wider process.

The particular questions which the research addresses are about professions and professionalisation.  These distinct but closely related terms are at the heart of a particular approach to raising standards whose potential in the banking sector we were trying to assess.  These issues are at the heart of much of our other research, our teaching, and our consultancy activities.   We were therefore able to bring to the research many of the ideas developed through our other work , and in turn the research has influenced our broader thinking on these issues. Continue reading ‘Professionalisation’ of the banking ‘profession’

The Foundation Forum: The Pavement of Good Intentions

On 8th September The Foundation held a forum in London on “The pavement of good intentions – how do we rebuild trust to get beyond the scandals and lies?”. The evening’s talks and discussion were structured around a central moral problem: why is it that too often good people end up doing bad things in public life? And how does this effect the trust that the public can have in these people? The speakers introduced examples of situations in which well-intentioned groups or individuals were entangled in dilemmas, public scandals, and lies. These examples were then used in order to identify some of the key factors that lead to morally questionable action and a loss of trust, as well as to suggest ideas on what it would take to avoid these problems arising again in the future. The broad consensus was that the key factor in “good people somehow breaking bad” in public life and the resulting lack of trust were of a structural and sometimes cultural nature, and that it would take a careful reform in both areas to minimise future incidences.

UPDATE: The official event write-up can be found here.

Continue reading The Foundation Forum: The Pavement of Good Intentions

Transitional Justice and Freedom: the case of Manbij

I recently read an article about how the town of Manbij in Syria had been freed from the oppressive rule of ISIS. The article contained a number of pictures of residents with beaming faces, they bore looks of relief, happiness and hope. Men were having their beards cut, after the 2 year ban on beard cutting imposed by the Islamic regime had been repealed. Women in Hijabs were smoking cigarettes openly and defiantly in the streets, others walked happily carrying their babies in their arms. Wide-eyed children cheerfully looked on at their elders. The pictures told of a mood of happiness, as though a huge weight had been lifted. And it was happiness at their new found sense of freedom – at enjoying a level of liberty that had previously been denied them under the oppressive regime.

The value of removing forces of oppression (be this in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Burundi or any other state riven apart by conflict, political fragility and illegitimate rule) lies for the most part in the value of increasing and protecting individual freedom. Continue reading Transitional Justice and Freedom: the case of Manbij

Workshop: Free Speech and the Requirements of Democracy

This event will be held at the Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied (IDEA) Centre, University of Leeds on 24th-25th August.

How we understand, protect, and discharge our rights and responsibilities as citizens is intimately connected to the standards and behaviour of our media in general, and our news media in particular. However, the media do not just stand between the citizenry and their leaders, or indeed between citizens and each other. The media is often the site where individuals attempt to realise some of the most fundamental democratic liberties, such as the right to free speech. Philosophers have been slow to recognise the unique institutional significance of the media in liberal democratic societies and to address the question of what duties should be assigned to individual citizens who engage, for a variety of reasons, in this kind of mass public communication.

In our workshop we will explore the conflict between the rights that people attempt to exercise in, and through, the media and the responsibilities that fall out of the awesome power of the modern media and the special role that it performs in a society committed to the principle of political equality.
Continue reading Workshop: Free Speech and the Requirements of Democracy

Senior Leaders’ Forum on Leadership Ethics

A Senior Leaders’ Forum on Leadership Ethics took place last week, on 22nd and 23rd June in London.

On the background ‘noise’ of votes being cast in the EU referendum, we were discussing what constitutes good leadership. Senior leaders from various areas were bringing up their experience, views and challenges they have faced in what resulted to be a very fruitful discussion. The questions on the discussion agenda were summarized in three sessions:

SESSION 1: Introduction: Plato as a major resource for understanding leadership. Platonic models of leadership.

SESSION 2: Leadership education – liberal arts vs. professional training.

SESSION 3: Leadership and mutual trust.

Continue reading Senior Leaders’ Forum on Leadership Ethics

Advisers and the Fiduciary Duty Debate

In the aftermath of the global financial crisis policymakers in the United States authorized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to conduct research into whether or not it would be advisable to attempt to improve the quality of investment advice by requiring investment advisers to adhere to a fiduciary standard of care.  The SECs study argued in favor of raising standards for all advisers and to require them to act as fiduciaries but without actually promulgating new regulations.  Instead, they asked the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to make the determination.  FINRA is a self-regulatory agency authorized by Congress with oversight by the SEC.  It is funded by investment firms for whom they also have supervisory responsibility.

FINRA having failed to take action, led the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to take up the matter claiming their right to do so as the regulatory body concerned with employees; including employee retirement savings plans.  Hence, the DOL with the support of the Obama administration, after intense debates with elected officials and after numerous public hearings, created new regulations which require advisers, but only those who advise on retirement assets, to act as fiduciaries.

In my paper, Advisers and the Fiduciary Debate[1] I discuss how on one side of the debate it is argued advisers need only concern themselves with recommendations which meet certain ‘suitability’ standards.  On the other side, there are those who argue the suitability standard is not strong enough to adequately protect investor interests.  And instead of ensuring investment recommendations are merely suitable, financial advisers owe their investors a fiduciary duty to “act in the best interest of the customer without regard to the financial or other interests . . . of the investment adviser providing the advice.” [2]. Continue reading Advisers and the Fiduciary Duty Debate